Soulmap — Interactive Prototype · 7 Screens
9:41
▲▲▲ WiFi 100%
A new kind of dating
We don't show you
faces first.
We learn who you are first.
5 minutes. No photos yet. Just honest answers and a system that actually tries to understand you.
Where are
you right now?
This changes. That's okay. Be honest with today, not who you want to be.
Passion
"The pull. The spark. The want to be near someone."
LowHigh
Intimacy
"Being known. Really known."
LowHigh
Commitment
"Choosing someone on the ordinary days too."
LowHigh
Your intention shape
You have an unexpected free Sunday. You —
Explore somewhere you've never been
Wander
Finally get that thing done you've been putting off
Build
Make a plan and execute it perfectly
Lead
Call someone and just talk for hours
Connect
Who are you
becoming?
Not who you are. Who you're growing into. Pick up to 5.
Selected: 0 / 5
learning to slow down
building something real
becoming a better listener
figuring out what home means
getting comfortable with uncertainty
showing up more
learning to ask for help
choosing myself first
trusting people again
being more present
letting go of control
finding my own rhythm
becoming braver
learning what I actually want
rebuilding after something hard
Calibration match 1 of 5 — we're learning what works for you
Rohan
Builder
"Figuring out what home means. Learning to be more present."
74%
Triangle alignment
You're both looking for something similar right now. Same season, different stories.
learning to slow down
showing up more
being present
👤
Photo visible after your first conversation. We wanted you to see Rohan first.
👤
Rohan
Builder · 74% aligned
Hey, I saw we both have "figuring out what home means" as something we're working on. That's a bit of an unusual one — what does that mean for you?
10:32 AM
Honestly I've been asking myself that a lot lately. I think for me it's less about a place and more about a feeling of not being in transit anymore.
10:38 AM
That's exactly it. Like I've been "arriving somewhere" for years and I'm not sure when I actually got there or if I even recognise it.
10:41 AM
✦ A question worth asking
"What does a normal Tuesday look like in the life you're trying to build?"
Use this
Dismiss
I think home for me is waking up without dread. That's become my bar. Pretty low bar but it's honest.
10:45 AM
That's not a low bar. That's the whole thing actually.
10:47 AM
Your conversation with Rohan
How did
that feel?
🌱
Natural
Easy, like it could keep going
🌫
Forced
Like I was trying too hard
🌀
Still figuring out
Hard to say, honestly
Say more →
Design Rationale

Why this prototype looks
the way it does

Every choice — color, typography, spacing, motion — was made for Priya, Arjun, and Meera. Here's the thinking.

The Three Personas
Priya
26 · Software Engineer · Bangalore. Self-aware, therapy-literate, tired of performing. Wants depth but apps don't reward it.
Arjun
29 · Product Manager · Mumbai. Emotionally intelligent but avoidant. Opens apps when lonely, closes when they feel shallow. Ghosts not out of cruelty but escape.
Meera
32 · Freelance Writer · Delhi. Failed by both casual apps and matrimonial sites. Values growth above all. Waiting for an app to ask "who are you becoming?"

All three are urban, educated, 26-32, emotionally literate, burned out by existing apps. They respond to warmth not clinical UI, depth not gamification, honesty not marketing speak. They are sophisticated enough to appreciate being spoken to like adults.

Color Palette

Deep warm charcoal as base. Cream for text. Terracotta as accent — warm, human, nothing like Tinder red or Bumble yellow. Secondary gold for highlights.

Why — All three personas respond to warmth not sterile tech UI. Terracotta feels organic, grounded. No neon, no gradients, no "tech startup" purple.
Typography
Cormorant Garamond
DM Sans for body text
DM MONO FOR LABELS

Cormorant Garamond for headings — deeply literary, warm, feels like it belongs in a book not an app. DM Sans for body — clean but not cold.

Why — Meera in particular responds to editorial, literary choices. Priya appreciates clarity without corporate blandness. Arjun needs warmth not algorithmic coldness.
Spacing & Rhythm

Generous padding — 20-28px on cards, 24px horizontal screen margins. Nothing cramped. Breathing room between sections. Cards float with subtle borders not heavy shadows.

Why — All three personas are burned out by cluttered, gamified interfaces. Space signals respect for their attention. Meera especially responds to editorial breathing room.
Motion & Transitions

Slow fades between screens (0.4s), not instant snaps. Quiz cards slide out gracefully. Tag selections lift slightly. No jank, no aggressive bounces.

Why — Arjun's avoidance is triggered by aggressive gamified UI. Slow, intentional motion signals depth not addictive mechanics. Priya notices and appreciates craft.
Navigation Philosophy
Onboarding (Screens 1-4)

Linear. No back navigation during the quiz. Intentional — forces gut responses not overthinking. Progress dots show where you are but you can't skip ahead.

Why — Arjun overthinks. Priya second-guesses. Linear flow removes the option to optimize their answers.
Main App (Screens 5-7)

Full navigation. Back buttons work. Bottom nav has only 3 items — Matches, Conversations, Me. No discovery feed. No endless scroll.

Why — All three are exhausted by infinite feeds. Constraint is a feature. Limited options reduce decision fatigue.
Why Components Live Where They Do
Screen 2 — Triangle preview at bottom

As users adjust sliders, the triangle updates live below. It's not the hero — the sliders are. The visual is a reward for engagement not the first thing you see.

Screen 3 — Auto-advance after selection

Tapping an answer immediately slides to the next question. No "Next" button to click. Decisiveness is rewarded with momentum. Arjun doesn't get a chance to second-guess.

Screen 4 — Tag counter top right, not prominent

Small, quiet, not demanding. You notice it when you need it. Meera can focus on the reflective act of choosing who she's becoming without a gamified progress bar shouting at her.

Screen 5 — Photo at the bottom, not the top

Name, archetype, aspiration overlap, and compatibility score all come before the photo. The hierarchy is inverted. This is the entire point of the product made visible in the UI.

Screen 6 — Depth prompt appears inline, dismissible

Not a modal. Not blocking. Sits in the conversation like a quiet suggestion. Priya will use it. Meera will dismiss it and ask her own better question. Both are correct responses.

Screen 7 — Three tiles, not a rating scale

"Natural / Forced / Still figuring out" instead of 1-5 stars. Language that matches how people actually reflect, not how products want to measure them. The third option is specifically for Arjun.

What This Design Deliberately Isn't

Every pixel, every word, every transition was designed to feel like someone finally built an app that gets it. That gets them.